KLI

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced penile cancer: report from the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors

Metadata Downloads
Abstract
Background: Treatment options for penile squamous cell carcinoma are limited. We sought to investigate clinical outcomes and safety profiles of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with locally advanced or metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors between 2015 and 2022 across 24 centers in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Objective response rates were determined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 criteria. Treatment-related adverse events were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Two-sided statistical tests were used for comparisons.

Results: Among 92 patients, 8 (8.7%) were Asian, 6 (6.5%) were Black, and 24 (29%) were Hispanic and/or Latinx. Median (interquartile range) age was 62 (53-70) years. In all, 83 (90%) had metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma, and 74 (80%) had received at least second-line treatment. Most patients received pembrolizumab monotherapy (n = 26 [28%]), combination nivolumab-ipilimumab with or without multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n = 23 [25%]), or nivolumab (n = 16 [17%]) or cemiplimab (n = 15 [16%]) monotherapies. Median overall and progression-free survival were 9.8 months (95% confidence interval = 7.7 to 12.8 months) and 3.2 months (95% confidence interval = 2.5 to 4.2 months), respectively. The objective response rate was 13% (n = 11/85) in the overall cohort and 35% (n = 7/20) in patients with lymph node-only metastases. Visceral metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or higher, and a higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were associated with worse overall survival. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 27 (29%) patients, and 9.8% (n = 9) of the events were grade 3 or higher.

Conclusions: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are active in a subset of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. Future translational studies are warranted to identify patients more likely to derive clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Author(s)
Talal El ZarifAmin H NassarGregory R PondTony Zibo ZhuangViraj MasterBassel NazhaScot NiglioNicholas SimonAndrew W HahnCurtis A PettawayShi-Ming TuNoha Abdel-WahabMaud VelevRonan FlippotSebastiano ButiMarco MaruzzoArjun MittraJinesh GheeyaYuanquan YangPablo Alvarez RodriguezDaniel CastellanoGuillermo de VelascoGiandomenico RovielloLorenzo AntonuzzoRana R McKayBruno VincenziAlessio CortelliniGavin HuiAlexandra DrakakiMichael GloverAli Raza KhakiEdward El-AmNabil AdraTarek H MouhieddineVaibhav PatelAida PiedraAngela GernoneNancy B DavisHarrison MatthewsMichael R HarrisonRavindran KanesvaranGiulia Claire GiudicePedro BarataAlberto FarolfiJae Lyun LeeMatthew I MilowskyCharlotte StahlfeldLeonard ApplemanJoseph W KimDory FreemanToni K ChoueiriPhilippe E SpiessAndrea NecchiAndrea B ApoloGuru P Sonpavde
Issued Date
2023
Type
Article
Keyword
Antineoplastic agentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCancerHuman beingsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleNivolumabOlder peopleRetrospective Studies
DOI
10.1093/jnci/djad155
URI
https://oak.ulsan.ac.kr/handle/2021.oak/16618
Publisher
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
Language
영어
ISSN
0027-8874
Citation Volume
115
Citation Number
12
Citation Start Page
1605
Citation End Page
1615
Appears in Collections:
Medicine > Nursing
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.