KLI

Codeine prescription pattern and treatment responses in patients with chronic cough: a routinely collected institutional database analysis

Metadata Downloads
Abstract
Background: Codeine has been long used as an antitussive drug in several countries. However, a prescription pattern of codeine, such as dose or treatment duration, has not been reported in detail. Furthermore, there is few scientific evidence on the efficacy and safety. We aimed to examine codeine prescription pattern and explore treatment response in patients with chronic cough in real-world practice.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with chronic cough who were newly referred to tertiary allergy and asthma clinics between July 2017 and July 2018. Routinely collected electronic healthcare records (EHRs), including medical notes, prescriptions, and outpatient visits, were analyzed. Codeine prescription records were examined for duration, mean daily dose, and 1-year cumulative dose. Codeine responses were evaluated by manual EHR reviews.

Results: Among a total of 1,233 newly referred patients with chronic cough, 666 were prescribed codeine for a median [interquartile range (IQR)] of 27.5 days (IQR 14-60 days); the median daily dose was 30 mg/year (IQR 21.6-30 mg/year), and the 1-year cumulative dose was 720 mg/year (IQR 420-1,800 mg/year). About 14.0% of patients were prescribed codeine for >8 weeks; they were older and had a longer cough duration, throat abnormal sensation and less dyspnea than patients prescribed codeine for ≤8 weeks or who did not receive codeine. Codeine prescription and duration was positively associated with the number of other cough-related medications, diagnostic tests, or outpatient visits. Cough status change was noted in 61.3% of codeine-prescribed patients (as 'improved' in 40.1% and 'not improved' in 21.2%), but not documented in 38.7%. Side effects were described in 7.8%.

Conclusions: Codeine prescription may be frequent and chronic in real-world practice of patients with chronic cough, despite the lack of robust clinical evidence on the efficacy. High prescription rates suggest unmet clinical needs. Prospective studies are warranted to identify codeine treatment responses and safety, and to build up clinical evidence to guide appropriate use of narcotic antitussives.
Issued Date
2023
Ji-Yoon Oh
Yu Ri Kang
Jin An
Eugene Choo
Ji-Hyang Lee
Hyouk-Soo Kwon
Jae-Seung Lee
Sei Won Lee
Tae-Bum Kim
Yeon-Mok Oh
You Sook Cho
Sang-Do Lee
Woo-Jung Song
Type
Article
Keyword
Codeineantitussivecoughreal-world evidenceroutinely collected data
DOI
10.21037/jtd-22-1857
URI
https://oak.ulsan.ac.kr/handle/2021.oak/17128
Publisher
JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE
Language
영어
ISSN
2072-1439
Citation Volume
15
Citation Number
4
Citation Start Page
2344
Citation End Page
2354
Appears in Collections:
Medicine > Nursing
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.