親權廢止論의 韓國親權法에 대한 意義

Abstract

친권은 의무성이 강한 권리라는 성격을 가지고 있다. 이러한 친권의 의무성ㆍ후견성을 더욱 강조하는 이론으로 친권후견통일론(친권폐지론)이 있다. 본 고에서는 子를 위한 친권의 발전적 발상이라고 평가받고 있는 동 이론이 우리 친권법에 대하여 어떠한 의의를 가지는지 검토하여 보았다.

Parental right is generally accepted as a duty rather than a right. As a result of emphasis on the side of duty, there emerged a theory on the unification of parental right and guardianship which eventually leads to the abolition of parental right. This theory is estimated as a developmental idea of "parental responsibility for child"

This paper aims to examine the meaning of that theory in the light of Korean civil law.

Parental right is generally accepted as a duty rather than a right. As a result of emphasis on the side of duty, there emerged a theory on the unification of parental right and guardianship which eventually leads to the abolition of parental right. This theory is estimated as a developmental idea of "parental responsibility for child"

This paper aims to examine the meaning of that theory in the light of Korean civil law.