KLI

정신역동의 이론적 임상체계화 과정 모형

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
Model of Psychodynamic Formulation
Abstract
The present study was attempted to critically and comprehensively review the literature for exploring program and concept of psychodynamic formulation and construct model of psychodynamic formulation suitable for residency education and profitable to its clinical applications.

The summary identified through the review of the literature of formulation was as follows:

1. Different systemic approaches to the process of formulation were conceptualized as theoretical models such as psychoanalysis, ego psychological model, central conflict focusing approach, idiosyncratic psychodynamic approach, and biological approach etc.

2. Systemic explanations of formulation included multiple viewpoints of 3 divisions of structural, dynamic and genetic factors. These 3 divisions were made for pedagogical purposes, even though a thorough understanding requires the ability to integrate all of the divisions.

3. The author suggested that it preferred to use one primary model such as psychoanalysis or ego psychological approach, introducing secondary models such as self psychological model and/or object relations model to explain features of patient that do not easily fit the primary model.
The present study was attempted to critically and comprehensively review the literature for exploring program and concept of psychodynamic formulation and construct model of psychodynamic formulation suitable for residency education and profitable to its clinical applications.

The summary identified through the review of the literature of formulation was as follows:

1. Different systemic approaches to the process of formulation were conceptualized as theoretical models such as psychoanalysis, ego psychological model, central conflict focusing approach, idiosyncratic psychodynamic approach, and biological approach etc.

2. Systemic explanations of formulation included multiple viewpoints of 3 divisions of structural, dynamic and genetic factors. These 3 divisions were made for pedagogical purposes, even though a thorough understanding requires the ability to integrate all of the divisions.

3. The author suggested that it preferred to use one primary model such as psychoanalysis or ego psychological approach, introducing secondary models such as self psychological model and/or object relations model to explain features of patient that do not easily fit the primary model.
Author(s)
김헌수
Issued Date
1993
Type
Research Laboratory
URI
https://oak.ulsan.ac.kr/handle/2021.oak/5299
http://ulsan.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002024749
Alternative Author(s)
Kim,Hun-Soo
Publisher
울산의대학술지
Language
kor
Rights
울산대학교 저작물은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
Citation Volume
2
Citation Number
1
Citation Start Page
89
Citation End Page
101
Appears in Collections:
Research Laboratory > The ULSAN university medical journal
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.