KLI

한국 정신 역동학실제의 현황 분석

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
The Current Status of Psychodynamic Formulation in Korea
Abstract
This study was intended to get the base-line data of psychodynamic formulation for teaching the residents through the analysis of the current status of psychodynamic formulation in Korea.

Data were collected through the mailings-questionnaire survey. Subjects served for this study consisted of 1,034 psychiatrists including 259 residents and 775 psychiatric specialists in Korea, using census method.

Statistical method employed was percentage rate.

1. 267 respondents(25.8%) among 1,034 psychiatrists replied to our mailings questionnaire.

2. 83.5 percent of respondents perceived psychodynamic formulation to be very important, 46.8 percent of respondents felt formulation to be crucial for second year residents, while 37.8 percent of respondents stated that they referred to textbooks of psychiatry, others(25.1 percent) sent guidelines for the mental status examination and/or descriptions of the intake interview.

5.6 percent of respondents did not provide any materials for psychodynamic formulation.

2 percent of respondents did not answer this question. 55.4 percent of respondents recognized general psychiatry, psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry to be more important than the teaching of formulation.

As a result, though the Korean psychiatrists recognized formulation to be very important, they did not sufficiently provide the materials about psychodynamic formulation.

3. the Korean psychiatrists prefered to psychoanalysis models, focal psychodynamic approaches and/or biopsychosocial approaches in case of formulating the psychiatric patients, while the American psychiatrists tended to adapt psychoanalysis and/or ego psychological models to their patients.

4. 72.7 percent of respondents indicated that they distinguished psychodynamic formulation and diagnostic assessment, while 20.9% of respondents emphasized that all patients require a diagnostic assessment. 48.7 percent of respondents viewed that psychodynamic tended to be overlooked and declined due to recent advanced biological psychiatry.
This study was intended to get the base-line data of psychodynamic formulation for teaching the residents through the analysis of the current status of psychodynamic formulation in Korea.

Data were collected through the mailings-questionnaire survey. Subjects served for this study consisted of 1,034 psychiatrists including 259 residents and 775 psychiatric specialists in Korea, using census method.

Statistical method employed was percentage rate.

1. 267 respondents(25.8%) among 1,034 psychiatrists replied to our mailings questionnaire.

2. 83.5 percent of respondents perceived psychodynamic formulation to be very important, 46.8 percent of respondents felt formulation to be crucial for second year residents, while 37.8 percent of respondents stated that they referred to textbooks of psychiatry, others(25.1 percent) sent guidelines for the mental status examination and/or descriptions of the intake interview.

5.6 percent of respondents did not provide any materials for psychodynamic formulation.

2 percent of respondents did not answer this question. 55.4 percent of respondents recognized general psychiatry, psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry to be more important than the teaching of formulation.

As a result, though the Korean psychiatrists recognized formulation to be very important, they did not sufficiently provide the materials about psychodynamic formulation.

3. the Korean psychiatrists prefered to psychoanalysis models, focal psychodynamic approaches and/or biopsychosocial approaches in case of formulating the psychiatric patients, while the American psychiatrists tended to adapt psychoanalysis and/or ego psychological models to their patients.

4. 72.7 percent of respondents indicated that they distinguished psychodynamic formulation and diagnostic assessment, while 20.9% of respondents emphasized that all patients require a diagnostic assessment. 48.7 percent of respondents viewed that psychodynamic tended to be overlooked and declined due to recent advanced biological psychiatry.
Author(s)
김헌수김현실민병근
Issued Date
1993
Type
Research Laboratory
URI
https://oak.ulsan.ac.kr/handle/2021.oak/5329
http://ulsan.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002025036
Alternative Author(s)
Kim,Hun-SooKim,Hyun-SilMin,Byung-Kun
Publisher
울산의대학술지
Language
kor
Rights
울산대학교 저작물은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
Citation Volume
2
Citation Number
1
Citation Start Page
44
Citation End Page
53
Appears in Collections:
Research Laboratory > The ULSAN university medical journal
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.