정구선수의 반응시간에 관한 연구

Abstract

본 연구는 남자 고등학교 정구선수들의 국부 반응시간과 전신 반응시간을 집단별로 비교 분석 하였다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 포지션별, 운동경력별, 경기 수준별, 경기 유형별로 국부 반응시간 및 전신 반응시간을 비교 분석하였다.

연구의 대상은 울산광역시, 대구광역시 및 경상북도 소재 남자고등학교에 재학중인 정구선수 32명을 선정하였으며 유의수준 .05 에서 이원변량분석으로 검증하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다.

1. 국부 반응시간 비교

1) 전·후위별 반응시간 실험에서 전?㎰? 후위 집단간 유의한 차이가 나타났으며 선택 대안수간에도 집단간 유의한 차가 있었다.

2) 운동경력별 반응시간 비교 실험에서 운동경력이 많은 선수가 운동경력이 낮은 선수보다 반응시간이 빨랐지만 유의한 차는 없었다.

3) 경기 수준별 반응시간 비교실험에서 비우수 선수집단이 우수선수 집단보다 반응시간이 빨랐으나 유의한 차는 없었다.

4) 경기유형별 반응시간 비교 실험에서 복식 선수 집단이 단식 선수 집단보다 반응시간이 발랐으나 유의한 차는 없었다.

2. 전신 반응시간 비교

1) 전·후위별 반응시간 비교 실험에서 집단간 유의 한 차이가 있었고, 소리와 빛에 대한 자극간에서도 집단간 유의한 차가 있었다.

2) 운동 경력별 반응시간 비교 실험에서 집단간 유의한 차는 없었으나 소리와 빛에 대한 자극간에서 집단간 유의한 차가 있었다.

3) 경기 수준별 반응시간 교 실험에서는 집단간 유의한 차는 없었으나 소리와 빛에 대한 자극간에서 집단간 유의한 차가 있었다.

4) 경기유형별 반응시간 비교 실험에서 유의한 차는 없었으나 소리와 빛에 대한 자극간에서 집단간 유의한 차가 있었다.

The aim of this study is to analyze the local reaction time and whole body reaction time of high school soft tennis player based on the position of play, carrier of competition, level of performance and competition category.

The subjects of this study were 32 soft tennis players in Ulsan Metropolitan City, Daegu Metropolitan City and Gyungsangbukdo Province. The mesurement in reaction times were analyzed by ANOVA in the significant level of .05.

1. Comparison of the local reaction time.

1) By the position of play, reaction time was a significant difference between fore and back player.

2) By the carrier of competition, reaction time of the subjects who have had the more carrier of competition showed the faster reaction time than the less experience a but there was no significant differences between three groups.

3) By the level of performance, the subjects who were inferior in performance showed the faster reaction time but there was no significant differences between two groups.

4) By the competition category, the doubles player showed the faster reaction time than singles player but there was no significant differences between two groups.

2. Comparison of the whole body reaction time

1) By the position of play, reaction time was a significant difference between fore and back player group. And there was a significant difference on the stimulus of sound and light signals.

2) By the carrier of competition, reaction time was no significant difference between three groups. And there was a significant difference on the stimulus of sound and light signals.

3) By the level, of competition,, reaction time was no significant differences between two groups. And there was a significant difference on the stimulus of sound and light signals.

4) By the competition category, reaction time was no significant difference between singles and doubles player. And there was a significant difference on the stimulus of sound and light signals.

The aim of this study is to analyze the local reaction time and whole body reaction time of high school soft tennis player based on the position of play, carrier of competition, level of performance and competition category.

The subjects of this study were 32 soft tennis players in Ulsan Metropolitan City, Daegu Metropolitan City and Gyungsangbukdo Province. The mesurement in reaction times were analyzed by ANOVA in the significant level of .05.

1. Comparison of the local reaction time.

1) By the position of play, reaction time was a significant difference between fore and back player.

2) By the carrier of competition, reaction time of the subjects who have had the more carrier of competition showed the faster reaction time than the less experience a but there was no significant differences between three groups.

3) By the level of performance, the subjects who were inferior in performance showed the faster reaction time but there was no significant differences between two groups.

4) By the competition category, the doubles player showed the faster reaction time than singles player but there was no significant differences between two groups.

2. Comparison of the whole body reaction time

1) By the position of play, reaction time was a significant difference between fore and back player group. And there was a significant difference on the stimulus of sound and light signals.

2) By the carrier of competition, reaction time was no significant difference between three groups. And there was a significant difference on the stimulus of sound and light signals.

3) By the level, of competition,, reaction time was no significant differences between two groups. And there was a significant difference on the stimulus of sound and light signals.

4) By the competition category, reaction time was no significant difference between singles and doubles player. And there was a significant difference on the stimulus of sound and light signals.