KLI

CT-determined resectability of borderline resectable and unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma following FOLFIRINOX therapy

Metadata Downloads
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to assess the ability of CT-determined resectability, as defined by a recent version of NCCN criteria, and associated CT findings to predict margin-negative (R0) resection in patients with PDAC after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. Methods: Sixty-four patients (36 men and 28 women; mean age, 58.8?years) with borderline resectable or unresectable PDAC who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were evaluated retrospectively. CT findings were independently assessed by two abdominal radiologists according to NCCN criteria (version 3. 2019). Tumor resectability was classified as resectable, borderline resectable, or unresectable, and change in resectability was classified as regression, stability, or progression. The associations of R0 resection rate with CT-determined resectability and change in resectability categories were evaluated, as were the sensitivity and specificity of NCCN criteria for R0 resection. Factors associated with R0 resection were identified by logistic regression analysis. Results: R0 resection rate did not differ significantly among the resectable, borderline resectable, or unresectable PDAC (67?73%, p = 0.95) or among PDAC with regression, stability, or progression (56?77%, p = 0.39). The sensitivity and specificity for R0 resection were 67% and 37%, respectively, for resectability (resectable/borderline vs. unresectable) and 80% and 21%, respectively, for changes in resectability (regression/stable vs. progression). Low-contrast enhancement of soft tissue contacting artery (≤ 46.4 HU) was independently associated with R0 resection (p = 0.01). Conclusion: CT-determined resectability after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy was relatively insensitive and non-specific for predicting R0 resection. Low-contrast enhancement of soft tissue contacting artery may increase the ability of CT to predict R0 resection. Key Points: ? Margin-negative resection rate of pancreatic cancer following FOLFIRINOX therapy did not differ among each resectability (67?73%, p = 0.95) based on NCCN criteria or changes in resectability categories (56?77%, p = 0.39). ? The sensitivity and specificity for margin-negative resection were 67% and 37% for resectability (resectable/borderline vs. unresectable) and 80% and 21% for changes in resectability (regression/stable vs. progression). ? Low-contrast enhancement of soft tissue contacting artery (≤ 46.4 HU) was independently associated with margin-negative resection (p = 0.01).
Author(s)
장종건변재호강지훈손정희김진희이승수김형중유창훈김규표홍승모서동완김송철이문규
Issued Date
2021
Type
Article
Keyword
Pancreatic neoplasmNeoadjuvant therapyDiagnosisPancreatectomyNeoplasm staging
DOI
10.1007/s00330-020-07188-8
URI
https://oak.ulsan.ac.kr/handle/2021.oak/7329
https://ulsan-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A649011139&context=PC&vid=ULSAN&lang=ko_KR&search_scope=default_scope&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=default_tab&query=any,contains,CT-determined%20resectability%20of%20borderline%20resectable%20and%20unresectable%20pancreatic%20adenocarcinoma%20following%20FOLFIRINOX%20therapy&offset=0&pcAvailability=true
Publisher
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Location
미국
Language
영어
ISSN
0938-7994
Citation Volume
31
Citation Number
2
Citation Start Page
813
Citation End Page
823
Appears in Collections:
Medicine > Medicine
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.